Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX 1650): An Entry-Level Gaming Laptop, Put Through VR

2021年3月16日2026年9月5日

本ページは広告（アフィリエイトプログラム）を含みます。詳しくはプライバシーポリシーをご覧ください。

Lenovo lent me a light-duty gaming laptop, the “Lenovo Legion 550Pi." The unit I am testing this time carries a GeForce GTX 1650. How much VR can this model actually handle?

The Lenovo Legion 550Pi Lineup

The Lenovo Legion 550Pi is a gaming laptop that pairs a 10th-gen Intel Core CPU with an NVIDIA GeForce GPU.

Lenovo Legion 550Pi	Configurations
CPU	Intel Core i5-10300H Intel Core i7-10750H (one or the other)
GPU	GeForce RTX 2060 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1650 (one of the three)
Memory	8GB or 16GB
Chipset	Not disclosed
SSD	512GB or 1TB
HDD	None
Display	15.6″ matte LCD 1920×1080 (Full HD) 60Hz or 144Hz
Interfaces	HDMI x1 USB 3.0 (Type-A) x4 USB 3.0 (Type-C) x1 Mic/headphone combo jack x1 Wired LAN
Networking	Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.0
Webcam	None
Battery life	Roughly 10.8–11.8 hours (varies by configuration)
OS	Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Keyboard	Full-size (backlit)
Dimensions (W×D×H)	2.2L (363.1 x 259.6 x 23.6mm)
Power adapter	170W, 230W
Weight	~2.3kg
Price (tax included)	From ¥91,331 (as of March 28, 2021)

*Prices and configurations reflect the time of writing and change frequently. Please check the official site for current details.

The Lenovo Legion 550Pi runs a 10th-gen Intel CPU. Since 11th-gen Intel Core laptops were already reaching the market by this point, this is effectively a late-cycle product.

As of this writing (March 28, 2021), Lenovo’s own store carries 2 configurations, and 3 more configurations are in stock elsewhere.

The Test Setup: Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX 1650 Model)

Here is the spec sheet for the unit I borrowed. This is the configuration I am testing throughout this article.

Model	Lenovo Legion 550Pi
Display	15.6″ FHD IPS LCD (1920x1080px)
CPU	Intel Core i7-10750H 6 cores / 12 threads, 2.6GHz (Turbo Boost 5.0GHz)
GPU	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB GDDR6
Memory	16GB
SSD	512GB (NVMe/M.2)
HDD	None
Power adapter	170W
OS	Windows 10 Home 64-bit

The Lenovo Legion 550Pi’s GPU comes from the GeForce line. The unit here carries a GeForce GTX 1650 — a “GTX 1650" in name, but this particular one uses the faster GDDR6 memory variant.

Design and Build

The design here is identical to the GeForce RTX 2060 model I reviewed previously.

For the details, see that article:

Lenovo Legion 550Pi (RTX 2060): An Entry-Level Gaming Laptop That Actually Handl

Lenovo lent me a light-duty gaming laptop, the "Lenovo Legion 550Pi." This time I am l ...

https://kimono-oyaji.com/en/lenovo-legion-550pi-rtx2060-en/

Weight and Portability

The Laptop Itself

I weighed the unit.

Item	Weight
Laptop only	2.369kg
Laptop + power adapter	2.892kg

At roughly 2.4kg for the laptop alone, this is on the heavy side even for a gaming laptop.

Add the power adapter and you are at roughly 2.9kg.

Power Adapter

At 170W, the AC adapter is medium-sized as far as gaming laptops go. It is somewhat smaller and lighter than earlier models.

The adapter alone weighs about 400g, and roughly 500g with the cable — light enough that carrying it around does not feel unreasonable.

VR Performance Test Results

From here, I go through the VR performance of the Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX 1650 model). This section estimates VR performance from benchmark app scores.

Against the Recommended Oculus Spec

I compared this against a PC built to the minimum recommended Oculus GPU spec:

CPU: Intel Core i5-4590
GPU: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Memory: 8GB

The figures below are calculated from measured results.

*Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX1650 model) performance, with the Oculus recommended spec set to 100

3Dmark TimeSpy shows DirectX 12 rendering performance, and 3Dmark FireStrike shows VR rendering performance using richer graphics than TimeSpy’s “Orange Room" test — both scored against the recommended GTX 1060 6GB desktop set to 100. Cinebench CPU shows overall CPU compute power, and Cinebench SingleCore shows single-core compute power, both against the recommended Core i5-4590 set to 100. The memory score shows RAM capacity against the recommended 8GB set to 100.

Against the Oculus recommended performance, this comes in at roughly 80%.

Resolution Against Frame Rate

I ran VRMark across a range of resolutions. The horizontal axis is pixel count; the vertical axis is frame rate.

[kimono_cost_table title="Resolution vs. VRMark Score (Legion 550Pi GTX1650)"] 3.1|110.2|60|68|72 5|92|53|51|72 8.3|68|34|37|72 14.7|46|20|23.3|72 [/kimono_cost_table]

If you are using an Oculus Quest or Quest 2, look at roughly the 10-megapixel mark on the graph to estimate the frame rate you will get. At the default rendering-resolution setting of “1.0," even lightweight apps will likely drop frames. Turn down both resolution and quality in the app settings, and you can get a taste of PC VR.

Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX1650 model) VR performance: it does not reach the Oculus recommended spec, landing at roughly 80% of it. High resolution is not realistic, but lightweight apps will give you a taste of PC VR.

VR Score and Cost Performance

Against a score of 100 for the Oculus recommended spec, this comes out to 79.

Metric	Score
VR Score Higher is better performance	79
VR Cost Performance Higher is better value	77^*

*Calculated using the Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX1650)’s tax-included price of ¥107,422 as of March 12, 2021

Overall PC Performance

Here are the results from the PCMark10 benchmark app, which shows how the Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX1650 model) performs for non-gaming use.

I compared this against a desktop PC built around an “Intel Core i5-10400."

[kimono_bar title="PC Performance (Legion 550Pi)" color="#4363d8″ max="200″ note="Relative value, reference spec = 100″]
Overall|129
Essentials|115
Productivity|128
Digital Content Creation|141
[/kimono_bar]

*Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX1650 model) performance, with the Intel Core i5-10400 benchmark result set to 100

PCMark10’s “Overall" reflects total PC performance. “Essentials" reflects everyday tasks like launching apps and browsing, measured using real apps and a browser. “Productivity" reflects office-suite work like word processing and spreadsheets, measured with OpenOffice-family apps. “Digital Content Creation" reflects creative work — photo, video, and 3D graphics — measured with apps like GIMP.

It holds its own against a desktop PC without embarrassment.

Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX1650 model) baseline performance: it clears the performance of a typical mainstream Core i5 desktop PC. You are unlikely to feel short on power for ordinary work, whatever you are doing.

Standard Benchmark Results

Including the figures above, here are the standard benchmark results side by side. For VR use, this is more than enough performance.

Benchmark	Score
SteamVR Performance Test	Average fidelity: 6.1 (High) Frames tested: 9,612
VRMark	Orange Room: 5,055 Cyan Room: 2,754 Blue Room: 1,068
3DMark	Time Spy: 3,789 Fire Strike: 8,700
PCMark10	OVERALL: 5,277 Essentials: 8,827 Productivity: 7,879 Digital Content Creation: 5,734
CINEBENCH R20	CPU: 3,084 Single Core: 496
FINAL FANTASY XV	High quality: 3,956 (Standard)
FINAL FANTASY XIV	Maximum quality: 10,336 (Extremely comfortable)

Even the comparatively heavy “Final Fantasy XV" runs at high quality without trouble.

Storage

The C Drive

The unit carries an SK Hynix SSD supporting PCIe 3.0 x4.

Sequential read comes in above 2,000MB/s — a middling speed for an M.2 SSD.

Power Draw and Noise

For reference, I measured power draw and noise. The battery was at 100%, with the fan mode set to “Performance."

State	Power draw	Noise
Powered off	0W	32dB
Idle (“Performance" mode)	25W	38dB
Under load (3DMark)	166W	51dB

Once the fan spins up, you hear a whooshing sound. It appears to ramp fan speed in steps rather than running flat-out constantly. Even during VR use, it stays surprisingly unobtrusive.

Trying Various Headsets

I checked what kind of frame rate you get with each headset.

Wiring for DisplayPort Headsets

The Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX1650 model) has no DisplayPort of its own, but attaching a DisplayPort adapter to the rear USB Type-C port lets you connect an Oculus Rift S, a Vive-series headset, and similar devices.

The neighboring USB port also supports USB 3.0, so the cabling stays tidy.

Here is the adapter I used.

Oculus Rift S

The Oculus Rift S refreshes at 80Hz. I measured the frame rate in each app.

Prioritizing Quality

With the Oculus app set to “Prioritize quality," here is the frame rate for each app.

[kimono_bar title="Oculus Rift S (Quality priority) x Legion 550Pi (GTX1650)" unit="fps" color="#1e90ff"]
Half Life:ALYX max quality|67.6
Asgard’s Wrath easy|82.4
Asgard’s Wrath high|42.7
Medal of Honor|51.1
[/kimono_bar]

Even a heavy VR app like “Asgard’s Wrath" is playable, if barely, once you drop it to “easy" quality. That is more comfortable than I expected.

The heavier “Medal of Honor" drops frames badly and is not really playable.

Prioritizing Performance

With the Oculus app set to “Prioritize performance," here is the frame rate for each app.

[kimono_bar title="Oculus Rift S (Performance priority) x Legion 550Pi (GTX1650)" unit="fps" color="#1e90ff"]
Half Life:ALYX low quality|93.8
Half Life:ALYX max quality|63.4
Asgard’s Wrath easy|78.3
Asgard’s Wrath high|48.9
Medal of Honor|43.4
[/kimono_bar]

The frame rate barely changed even after switching the Oculus app’s priority setting.

Asgard’s Wrath is just barely enjoyable at “easy" quality, but Medal of Honor remains rough.

In principle, this setting should have raised the frame rate. Something in the background may have been competing for resources, but this still gives a reasonable picture of how each app behaves.

Vive Cosmos Elite

The Vive Cosmos Elite refreshes at 90Hz. I measured the frame rate in each app.

Rendering Resolution: 100% (2016×2380)

I set the video supersampling setting to 100% (per-eye resolution: 2016×2380) and measured the frame rate in each app.

Asgard’s Wrath and Medal of Honor could not even be measured — they simply took too long to start up.

A PC with a GTX 1650 appears to be too little for the Vive Cosmos Elite.

Rendering Resolution: 50% (1424×1680)

I set the video supersampling setting to 50% (per-eye resolution: 1424×1680) and measured the frame rate in each app.

At this setting, lighter apps become playable. That said, I would not say VR is genuinely enjoyable here.

Pimax 8K Plus

The Pimax 8K Plus can refresh at 72Hz, 90Hz, or 110Hz. I measured the frame rate in each app.

Field of View “Normal" (per eye: 3080 x 2632)

I checked the frame rate with the Pimax 8K Plus’s field-of-view setting at “Normal" (resolution, per eye: 3080 x 2632). This setting gives a wide field of view and strong immersion.

At this setting, even lightweight apps start dropping frames easily.

Enjoying VR at this wide a field of view seems to be a stretch with this hardware.

Field of View “Normal," SS 50% (per eye: 2176 x 1860)

I kept the Pimax 8K Plus’s field-of-view setting at “Normal," set SteamVR supersampling to 50% (resolution, per eye: 2176 x 1860), and checked the frame rate. This gives a wide field of view and strong immersion, but a somewhat soft, blurry image.

Lowering supersampling makes lightweight apps just about enjoyable.

The image is somewhat soft, but the wide field of view does add to the sense of immersion.

Personally, if you are going to use an expensive headset like this, I would recommend a PC with a GPU to match.

Field of View “Small" (per eye: 2228 x 2632)

I checked the frame rate with the Pimax 8K Plus’s field-of-view setting at “Small" (resolution, per eye: 2228 x 2632). This setting still gives a wider field of view than a typical headset.

Heavy apps and quality-focused settings drop below 72fps here. “Medal of Honor" is a lost cause at this setting too.

Field of View “Potato" (per eye: 1776 x 2632)

I checked the frame rate with the Pimax 8K Plus’s field-of-view setting at “Potato" (resolution, per eye: 1776 x 2632). This setting gives a narrow field of view — you are not really getting what makes the Pimax 8K Plus worth using.

Heavy apps and quality-focused settings still drop below 72fps. “Medal of Honor" manages to launch here, but it is not comfortable.

Wiring for the Oculus Quest Series

The Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX1650 model) has a USB Type-C port on the back, so plugging an Oculus Quest or Quest 2 in there gives you fast charging plus uninterrupted Oculus Link.

The USB Type-C port delivers about 10W of power

Oculus Quest

The Oculus Quest refreshes at 72Hz. I measured the frame rate in each app.

Default Setting (4128 x 2272)

I left the PC-side Oculus app’s rendering resolution at the middle “1.0x" setting (resolution: 4128 x 2272) and measured the frame rate in each app.

[kimono_bar title="Oculus Quest (resolution 1.0x) x Legion 550Pi (GTX1650)" unit="fps" color="#1e90ff"]
Half Life:ALYX max quality|60.7
Asgard’s Wrath easy|78.1
Asgard’s Wrath high|42.4
Medal of Honor|14.1
[/kimono_bar]

Something on the order of Skyrim or Half-Life: Alyx runs without a problem.

Even a heavy app like Asgard’s Wrath manages to launch, but pushing for high quality causes frame drops. For smooth play, it seems better to lower the rendering resolution.

Medal of Honor is a lost cause here.

Frame-Rate-Focused Setting (3104 x 1712)

I set the PC-side Oculus app’s rendering resolution to the minimum “0.8x" (resolution: 3104 x 1712), the setting that should maximize frame rate. This produces a soft, heavily-compressed-looking image, but with stable performance.

[kimono_bar title="Oculus Quest (resolution 0.8x) x Legion 550Pi (GTX1650)" unit="fps" color="#1e90ff"]
Half Life:ALYX max quality|64.1
Asgard’s Wrath easy|54.3
Asgard’s Wrath high|43.9
Medal of Honor|48.3
[/kimono_bar]

This should be the setting that gets the most frame rate out of the Oculus Quest, but the numbers did not come out especially high. Some other process may have been competing for resources, but the basic pattern holds: heavy apps still play back like a slideshow.

On the Oculus Quest, it is fair to write off Asgard’s Wrath and Medal of Honor as unplayable.

Quality-Focused Setting (5408×2976)

I set the PC-side Oculus app’s rendering resolution to the maximum “1.3x" (resolution: 5408×2976), the setting that maximizes image quality, and measured the frame rate.

[kimono_bar title="Oculus Quest (resolution 1.3x) x Legion 550Pi (GTX1650)" unit="fps" color="#1e90ff"]
Half Life:ALYX max quality|58.5
Asgard’s Wrath easy|31.3
Asgard’s Wrath high|13.7
Medal of Honor|5.8
[/kimono_bar]

This setting maximizes image quality, but frame rate falls apart.

Apps that were already dropping frames at the default setting drop even more here — some are effectively a slideshow.

Oculus Quest 2

The Oculus Quest 2 can refresh at 72Hz, 80Hz, or 90Hz. I measured the frame rate in each app.

Default Setting (4128 x 2096)

I left the PC-side Oculus app’s rendering resolution at the middle “1.0x" setting (resolution: 4128 x 2096) and measured the frame rate in each app.

[kimono_bar title="Oculus Quest 2 (resolution 1.0x) x Legion 550Pi (GTX1650)" unit="fps" color="#1e90ff"]
Half Life:ALYX max quality|65.4
Asgard’s Wrath easy|64.8
Asgard’s Wrath high|43
Medal of Honor|47.4
[/kimono_bar]

Lightweight apps run without a problem. Something like Skyrim or Half-Life: Alyx should be perfectly playable.

Asgard’s Wrath and Medal of Honor are dropping frames and do not run smoothly.

Frame-Rate-Focused Setting (2784 x 1408)

I set the PC-side Oculus app’s rendering resolution to the minimum “0.7x" (resolution: 2784 x 1408), the setting that should maximize frame rate. This produces a soft, heavily-compressed-looking image, but with stable performance.

[kimono_bar title="Oculus Quest 2 (resolution 0.7x) x Legion 550Pi (GTX1650)" unit="fps" color="#1e90ff"]
Half Life:ALYX max quality|60.9
Asgard’s Wrath easy|77.7
Asgard’s Wrath high|46
Medal of Honor|41.1
[/kimono_bar]

This is the setting that gets the most frame rate out of the Oculus Quest 2.

Even Asgard’s Wrath becomes comfortable to play here.

The very heavy Medal of Honor still drops frames. Not recommended.

Quality-Focused Setting (5408×2736)

I set the PC-side Oculus app’s rendering resolution to the maximum “1.3x" (resolution: 5408×2736), the setting that maximizes image quality, and measured the frame rate.

[kimono_bar title="Oculus Quest 2 (resolution 1.3x) x Legion 550Pi (GTX1650)" unit="fps" color="#1e90ff"]
Half Life:ALYX low quality|82.2
Half Life:ALYX max quality|55.6
Asgard’s Wrath easy|48.1
Asgard’s Wrath high|40.8
Medal of Honor|8.2
[/kimono_bar]

This setting maximizes image quality, but frame rate falls apart.

Lightweight apps like Beat Saber or Skyrim still run frame-drop-free, but on something like Half-Life: Alyx, the GPU can run short on memory, so textures load in late and the image can look smeary. Not a comfortable experience.

What I Could Not Verify

This is a single unit on loan from Lenovo, so I cannot say how much these numbers would vary from one unit to another. I did not test battery life under VR load, and I did not run mining or video-encoding benchmarks on this configuration.

In Summary: What This Laptop Is Good For

I have gone through the performance of Lenovo’s entry-level gaming laptop, the Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX1650 model).

What stood out as good:

・An easy-to-use layout with the ports concentrated on the back
・Strong cost performance for the level of power on offer
・PC VR is enjoyable with lightweight apps

What I would not recommend it for:

・At roughly 2.4kg, it is heavy even as a gaming laptop
・Not enough GPU power for serious PC VR

Personally, I find the Legion series’ back-loaded port layout very easy to live with. It keeps the desk tidy since the cabling stays out of the way, and having the power port on the back is a real plus.

Now, the Lenovo Legion 550Pi (GTX1650 model) carries the GTX 1650, the cheapest GPU in the current GeForce lineup.

Headset	Verdict
Oculus Rift S	Comfortable with lightweight apps.
Oculus Quest	Usable with lightweight apps, if you turn down image quality.
Oculus Quest 2	Usable with lightweight apps, if you turn down image quality.
Vive Cosmos Elite	Cannot deliver its full performance. Even at 50% supersampling or lower, it still falls short.
Pimax 8K Plus	Cannot deliver its full performance. At 50% supersampling or lower, lightweight apps become usable, if barely.

Against the Oculus recommended PC spec, this only reaches about 80% of the performance. That is fine for a taste of lightweight VR apps, but once you want to go deeper, you will need to upgrade the PC.

Personally, if VR is the point, I would recommend a model with at least a GTX 1660 Ti or an RTX 2060.

That said, the Legion 550Pi has a standard keyboard layout, so it feels perfectly normal for regular work. There are also configurations with Microsoft Office bundled in, so it can pull its weight outside of gaming too.

PC Benchmarks